A complete model for electromagnetic and directed-energy effects on hostile UAS platforms — from first sensor event to terminal state. Physics, state transitions, wave behavior modulation, escape logic, and worked scenarios sourced from the EDGE Atmos BRD.
Every hostile drone moves through a six-stage chain. Intel AI owns stages 1–4 — evidence to classification. Strike AI owns 4–6 — planning to execution. Neutralisation occurs inside Task execution.
Six steps run every tick (10 Hz) per active drone-wave pair. I_eff_tick is produced by the EW Wave engine. Steps 2–6 are the neutralisation model's responsibility.
Six states. Five are one-way S-threshold transitions — exposure is permanent so S can only increase. Escaped is the only two-way state. Re-entry resumes immediately at the S-correct state.
B(t) multiplies I_eff_base every tick. Without it, a pulsing dome, a sweeping sector jammer, and a held gun lock look identical to the accumulation model — which is wrong.
Nine counter-drone wave families. F_match determines whether the wave has any effect — SATCOM drones (TB2, CH-4B, Wing Loong II, Akinci) have F_match = 0 against all ground-based RF jammers.
When a drone is inside two or more wave volumes, effective intensities combine with diminishing returns — not simple addition. Total can never exceed I_max (strongest single asset at point-blank).
Select a threat drone and a counter-drone asset, then set engagement parameters. The simulator computes I_eff, exposure accumulation rate, time to neutralise, and the resulting S-score and state.
Eleven end-to-end scenarios with BRD-sourced drone and asset IDs. Covers all five wave behaviors, immune targets, escape and re-entry, multi-wave, and DEW.
Non-negotiable constraints for every implementation of this model.